Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10281/176715 , 10281/4547
{"references": ["J.A. Alic. Postindustrial technology policy. Research Policy, 30:873-\n889, 2001.", "C. Anderson. The Long Tail. Random House Business, 2006.", "R. B. Chase. Where does the customer fit in a service operation?\nHarvard Business Review, November-December:138-139, 1978.", "R. B. Chase. The customer contact approach to services: Theoretical\nbases and practical extensions. Operations Research, 29(4):698-706,\n1981.", "R. B. Chase and D. A. Tansik. The customer contact model for\norganization design. Management Science, 29(9):1037-1050, 1983.", "H. Chesbrough and J. Spohrer. A research manifesto for services science.\nCommun. ACM, 49(7):35-40, 2006.", "R. Collison. Encyclopedias; their history throughout the ages. Hafner,\nNew York / London, 1964.", "W. Emigh and S. C. Herring. Collaborative Authoring on the Web:\nA Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias. In Proceedings of the\n38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,\nHICSS-05., 2005.", "J.A. Fitzsimmons and M.J. Fitzsimmons. Service Management: Operations,\nStrategy, and Information Technology. McGraw-Hill, New York,\nNY, 2001.\n[10] http://www.flikr.com/.\n[11] V. R. Fuchs. The service economy. National Bureau of Economic\nResearch, New York, 1968.\n[12] J. Gadrey. The Misuse of Productivity Concepts in Services: Lessons\nfrom a Comparison between France and the United States. In J. Gadrey\nand F. Gallouj, editors, Productivity, Innovation, and Knowledge in\nServices: New Economic and Socio-Economic Approaches. Edward\nElgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, 2002.\n[13] P. d. Hertog. Co-producers of innovation: on the role of knowledgeintensive\nbusiness services in innovation. In J. Gadrey and F. Gallouj,\neditors, Productivity, Innovation, and Knowledge in Services: New\nEconomic and Socio-Economic Approaches. Edward Elgar Publishing,\nCheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, 2002.\n[14] J. A. Herzenberg, S. A. Alic and H. Wial. New rules for a new economy:\nemployment and opportunity in post-industrial America. Cornell\nUniversity Press, Ithaca, NY, 1998.\n[15] T. P. Hill. On goods and services. Review of Income and Wealth,\n23(4):315-38, December 1977.\n[16] H. Kang. Technology management in services: knowledge-based vs.\nknowledge-embedded services. Strategic Change, 15(2):67-74, 2006.\n[17] U. Karmarkar and R. Pitbladdo. Service markets and competition.\nJournal of Operations Management, 12:397-411, 1995.\n[18] D. L. Kellogg and R. B. Chase. Constructing an empirically derived\nmeasure for customer contact. Manage. Sci., 41(11):1734-1749, 1995.\n[19] P. Levy. L-intelligence collective. La D'ecouverte, Paris, 1997.\n[20] A. Lih. Wikipedia as participatory journalism: Reliable sources?\nmetrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource. In 5th\nInternational Symposium on Online Journalism, April 2004.\n[21] C. H. Lovelock. Classifying services to gain strategic marketing insights.\nJournal of Marketing, 47(3):9-20, 1983.\n[22] C.H. Lovelock and E. Gummesson. Wither services marketing? In search\nof a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of Service Research,\n7(1):20-41, 2004.\n[23] T. O-Reilly. What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for\nthe Next Generation of Software, September 2005.\n[24] L. D. Paulson. Services science: A new field for today-s economy.\nComputer, 39(8):18-21, 2006.\n[25] C. Pinhanez. Service systems as customer-intensive systems and its\nimplications for service science and engineering. In Proceedings of\nthe 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,\nHICSS -08, pages 117-126, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. IEEE Computer\nSociety.\n[26] S. E. Sampson and C. M. Froehle. Foundations and implications\nof a proposed unified services theory. Production and Operations\nManagement, 15:329-343, 2006.\n[27] J. Spohrer and P. Maglio. Emergence of service science: Toward systematic\nservice innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production\nand Operations Management, 2007.\n[28] B. Stvilia, M. B. Twidale, and L.C. Smith. Information Quality: Discussions\nin Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the International Conference\non Knowledge Management, ICKM-05, October 2005.\n[29] M. Vi'egas, F. B. Wattenberg and K. Dave. Studying cooperation and\nconflict between authors with history flow visualizations. In Proceedings\nof the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI\n-04, pages 575-582, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press.\n[30] http://www.wikipedia.org/.\n[31] D. M. Wilkinson and B. A. Huberman. Assessing the value of\ncooperation in Wikipedia. First Monday, 12, 2007.\n[32] M. Xue and P. T. Harker. Service co-production, customer efficiency and\nmarket competition. Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers\n03-03, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of\nPennsylvania, January 2003.\n[33] http://www.youtube.com/."]}
The paper is concerned with relationships between SSME and ICTs and focuses on the role of Web 2.0 tools in the service development process. The research presented aims at exploring how collaborative technologies can support and improve service processes, highlighting customer centrality and value coproduction. The core idea of the paper is the centrality of user participation and the collaborative technologies as enabling factors; Wikipedia is analyzed as an example. The result of such analysis is the identification and description of a pattern characterising specific services in which users collaborate by means of web tools with value co-producers during the service process. The pattern of collaborative co-production concerning several categories of services including knowledge based services is then discussed.
Service Development Process; Service Interaction Patterns; Services Science; Web 2.0 tools; Engineering (all), Service Interaction Patterns, Service Interaction Patterns, Services science, Web 2.0 tools, Service Development Process, Services Science, Service Development Process., Web2.0 tools
Service Development Process; Service Interaction Patterns; Services Science; Web 2.0 tools; Engineering (all), Service Interaction Patterns, Service Interaction Patterns, Services science, Web 2.0 tools, Service Development Process, Services Science, Service Development Process., Web2.0 tools
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts