Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Journal . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Journal . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Journal . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
 View all 2 versions
Claim

¿Quién vigila a los vigilantes? El caso de ChatGPT como evaluador de artículos en revistas especializadas

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Journal 15 Dec 2023 Spanish Publisher:Zenodo
Authors: Carabantes Alarcón, David; González-Geraldo, José Luis; Jover, Gonzalo;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10473871 , 10.5281/zenodo.10473870

¿Quién vigila a los vigilantes? El caso de ChatGPT como evaluador de artículos en revistas especializadas

Abstract

Si hace no mucho alertábamos del peligro que entraña el concepto de “ventana contextual” en toda esta amalgama de inteligencias artificiales que nos vienen sepultando desde hace meses (Jover, Carabantes y González-Geraldo, 2023), hoy ponemos sobre la mesa los resultados de una reciente investigación, publicada en El Profesional de la Información (EPI), en la que evidenciamos, precisamente, entre otros asuntos, este claro límite de los modelos de lenguaje generativos (Carabantes, González-Geraldo y Jover, 2023).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Inteligencia Artificial Generativa, ChatGPT, Revistas, Evaluación

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green