
Figure 11. Microphthalmus sp. (A) Photoofanethanol-preservedspecimen (NHMUKANEA 2022.412–420), scalebaris 0.25 mm; (B) light micrograph of prostomium and three anterior achaetous segments (NHMUK ANEA 2022.434), scale bar is 100 µm; (C, D) light micrographs of parapodium with the prechaetal (C) and postchaetal (D) lobes in focus (NHMUK ANEA 2022.434), scale bars are 50 µm; (E) light micrograph of heterogomph falcigers with different lengths (NHMUK ANEA 2022.434), scale bar is 20 µm; (F) light micrograph of ventral aspect of the posterior end showing anal lamellae (NHMUK ANEA 2022.412–420), scale bar is 100 µm.
Published as part of Georgieva, Magdalena N., Wiklund, Helena, Ramos, Dino A., Neal, Lenka, Glasby, Christopher J. & Gunton, Laetitia M., 2023, The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia, pp. 167-213 in Records of the Australian Museum (Rec. Aust. Mus.) 75 (3) on page 180, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.75.2023.1800, http://zenodo.org/record/10414191
Phyllodocida, Annelida, Animalia, Microphthalmidae, Polychaeta, Biodiversity, Microphthalmus, Taxonomy
Phyllodocida, Annelida, Animalia, Microphthalmidae, Polychaeta, Biodiversity, Microphthalmus, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
