
There is an increasing employment of AI technologies in the civil security sector in the promise of improving efficiency mainly with regard to resource allocation and automatic data analysis. However, the widespread and intrusive uses of AI introduce new challenges, posing threats to fundamental rights and democratic principles (European Parliament, 2021). AI systems may escalate surveillance practices, amplify discriminatory practices and exacerbate pre-existing societal inequalities (e.g., O'neil 2017, Zuboff, 2019). Vulnerable populations, particularly children1, require special attention in this context (Charisi, 2022; Rahman & Keseru, 2021). To raise awareness on how AI can uphold or undermine children lives and rights, in 2021, UNICEF released a policy guidance on AI for children pinpointing how predictive analytics on children can limit their identities and experience of the world. As more decisions regarding children are being taken with the aid of predictive systems (Hall et al. 2023), it becomes important to understand how these technologies are developed, used, and how they might impact children's rights and lives.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
