Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2009
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2009
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2009
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Guidelines for Quality Index attribution to original data from Scientific literature or reports for EuroFIR data interchange

Authors: Salvini, Simonetta; Møller, Anders; Oseredczuk, Marine; Roe, Mark;

Guidelines for Quality Index attribution to original data from Scientific literature or reports for EuroFIR data interchange

Abstract

The document provides guidelines for quality assessment, and quality index attribution, of original data from scientific literature and laboratory reports. This system was inspired by existing systems (USDA, AFSSA, BASIS, CSPO, and BLS) and allows compilers to evaluate the quality of original data according to common guidelines based on eight scores: Food description Component identification Sampling plan Number of analytical samples Sample handling Sample analysis Analytical quality control Sum of 1-7 Together the eight scores form the quality index (QI).To help compilers with evaluation, a set of criteria is proposed within each category. Answers to these criteria guide the compiler through evaluation and each category receives a score from 1 to 5 (low to high). All scores are then summed to form the QI.Examples are provided at the end of the document. Key wordsCategories: set of items to be assessedCriteria: standard used to assess qualityScore: total number of points assigned to each categoryQuality Index: sum of the score of each category giving an overview of the quality (quality index - QI)Confidence code-CC: alternative way to express QI that is in general expressed as A, B, C or D

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities