Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Presentation . 2023
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2023
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

EASA's Proposed Environmental Label Programme – Benefits and Shortcomings

Authors: Scholz, Dieter;

EASA's Proposed Environmental Label Programme – Benefits and Shortcomings

Abstract

On their own, SAF and hydrogen aircraft are not the solution to aviation's climate problems (as conveyed by industry). E-fuels are needed rather than biofuels. E-fuels must be made from CO2 from the atmosphere (extracted by Direct Air Capture, DAC). Unfortunately, the renewable energy demand for aviation's e-fuel is higher than its availability. Any small progress is immediately compensated by traffic growth. Flying less is a fundamental solution that works! Passengers need to get informed (with an Ecolabel), need to decide if they want to travel at all, if they want to take the aircraft (or another mode of transport), and which aircraft and airline to select. Passenger are in a strong position. Passengers can vote with their feet! ReFuelEU, Article 14 "Environmental Labeling Scheme" is very promising, but some changes would be helpful. EASA has started with its "Environmental Labeling Scheme for Aviation". EASA's progress seems slow. EASA partnered with Google. Google has already a good solution: https://flights.google.com. HAW Hamburg has an Ecolabel for Aircraft ready and is working on its Airline Label and Flight Label.

Related Organizations
Keywords

airline, EASA, growth, SAF, Google, passenger, hydrogen, ecolabel, biofuel, ReFuelEU, CO2, DAC, e-fuel, Prof. Scholz @ Zenodo, climate, aircraft

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!