Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Maize Phosphorus Leaf Deficiency (MPLD) Database 224x224

Authors: Ramos-Ospina, Manuela;

Maize Phosphorus Leaf Deficiency (MPLD) Database 224x224

Abstract

Data collection Image acquisition was done by searching a diversity of conditions, although the plants were grown in laboratory conditions. In this way, photographs included the growth stages of seedling, jointing, and flowering. The images were acquired inside a plastic shed, involving natural illumination, and five consecutive images were taken by plant. Five acquisition devices were utilized, encompassing two types of regular smartphones (Xiaomi Redmi 8T and Moto G5 Plus), a digital camera (Samsung ES65), a single-lens reflex camera (Nikon D3100), and a compact scientific camera (ThorLabs DCC1645C-HQ). Image preprocessing and augmentation The original images underwent a preprocessing stage in terms of cropping and resizing by four concurrent methods, named: Cut to square: Image cropped to a central square. Quadrant division: Square image divided into four equal parts. Split into two parts: Rectangular image divided by two. Padding to square: A withe pad is added on the sides of rectangular image to complete it square. All cropped images were resized to 224x224 pixels size for fast deep learning model adaptation. Photos taken by each camera experienced at least two of four possible preprocessing methods, depending on the characteristics of the image.

Monitoring the nutritional status of crops is crucial to assessing high productivity, optimizing cost, and minimizing environmental impact. Given that nutritional deficiencies primarily manifest through visual characteristics, artificial vision stands out as a competitive choice to assess the nutritional status of individual plants. However, in order to train a supervised artificial vision system driven by convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a high amount of data, properly formatted and labeled is necessary. This work presents a curated image database to study single-nutrient deficiencies, specifically, phosphorus deficiency in maize leaves, named Maize Phosphorus Leaf Deficiency (MPLD) Database. This database is composed of 20892 samples of maize leaves placed on a withe background. Images are 224x224 pixels size, representing three levels of phosphorus deficiency: complete absence of the nutrient (labeled -P), half dose of the required phosphorus for normal plant development (-P50), and complete supply (C). 

ZIP folder is structured as follows: Five main folders represent images taken by each camera. Inside every folder, there are three more folders containing each nutritional treatment: -P, -P50, and C. Inside each treatment folder, the preprocessed images are placed with no division between preprocessing methods. 

Keywords

Image classification, Leaf analysis, Computer vision, Deep learning, Plant nutrition

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities