
This is one of the four EU27 country cluster reports which analyse the results of the expert survey conducted by INSPIRE, a Horizon Europe project aimed at building a sustainable centre of excellence on inclusive gender equality in research and innovation (R&I). The survey involved at least one expert in each EU27 Member State and provided crucial support to the INSPIRE research programme on structural change towards inclusive gender equality in R&I, through: collecting information and analysis on policy developments and research debates at the national level; and identifying engaged stakeholders, other potential experts and relevant resources in the country, as well as collecting suggestions to support existing or potential initiatives for developing new communities of practices (CoPs). The information collected was also meant to be a useful resource for the R&I ecosystem in Europe and beyond, including policy makers, researchers and equality practitioners across Europe. This Central West country cluster report analyses the results of the survey in six EU countries: Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. The information used to elaborate this report was collated by the following experts: Austria: Julia Greithanner, Florian Holzinger, and David Walker Belgium: Dounia Bourabain France: Suzanne de Cheveigné Germany: Carolina Wienand-Sangaré, Merve Yorulmaz, and Susanne Bührer Luxembourg: Jennifer Dusdal the Netherlands: Yvonne Benschop For further details regarding the methodology followed to collect the information and elaborate this report, please refer to the Methodological Annex.
Research & Innovation, Research & Innovation, Horizon Europe, Country Cluster Report, Central West Europe, Expert Survey, Gender Equality Plans, Inclusive Gender Equality
Research & Innovation, Research & Innovation, Horizon Europe, Country Cluster Report, Central West Europe, Expert Survey, Gender Equality Plans, Inclusive Gender Equality
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
