
The authorisation rules were provided for in the Press Law of 1984, arousing reluctance of journalists from the beginning. They noticed the inconvenience associated with this, not paying attention to the rights of both the interlocutor and the information interest of the recipients of press statements, interested in receiving messages consistent with the intention of the speaker. The construction of the provisions raised a number of reservations, in particular over the scope of the changes in relation to the original statement or the date of submission of the authorised text. The amendment to the regulations was intended to remove earlier doubts, which has not been fully accomplished. In particular, the right of the interlocutor to make changes to the content of a statement was significantly limited, which is sometimes in conflict with the relevant guarantees of copyright law. Undoubtedly, however, the current regulations facilitate the implementation of statutory rights and obligations in this area of law.
statutory conditions, authorisation, press, rights of the interlocutor, journalist's duties
statutory conditions, authorisation, press, rights of the interlocutor, journalist's duties
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
