Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D2.1f Literature Review Data Monitoring

5 x State-of the-art reports regarding 4 KSH domains + data monitoring report
Authors: Löther, Andrea; Karataş, Mazlum; Weber, Lena;

D2.1f Literature Review Data Monitoring

Abstract

The aim of the report is to give an overview of the literature on monitoring Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) in Research Performing Organisations (RPOs). The report displays information about monitoring GEPs and how GEPs can include an understanding of inclusive gender equality. As a method, we conducted a systematic literature scoping review on documents which were in three languages: English, Spanish, and German. We selected only publications that have a focus on monitoring gender equality plans and/or are considering intersectional approaches. We reviewed a total of 129 publications, which have been published since 2010. Among the examined publications, fifty-seven were scientific journal articles, thirty-four were derived from grey literature, twenty-four were articles in collective monographs, seven were monographs, and another seven were unspecified publication types. The scope of papers considered for this review exhibits a close focus on monitoring gender equality plans and/or considers intersectional/inclusive perspectives. For monitoring inclusive GEPs we define three areas for setting indicators: a) prevalence of GEP, b) implementation process of GEP and c) impact of GEP. We understand intersectionality and inclusion as analytical perspectives that have to be included in GEPs, but most studies have not yet reached to transfer them into monitoring approaches.

Keywords

Research Performing Organisations, Horizon Europe, Gender Equality Plans, Inclusive Gender Equality

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green