Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2023
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

D2.1b KSH2 Report: Initiating Change Beyond the Centre. A Literature Review of Gender Equality Plans in Research Organisations across Europe

5 x State-of the-art reports regarding 4 KSH domains + data monitoring report
Authors: Krzaklewska, Ewa; Sekuła, Paulina; Warat, Marta; Ratecka, Anna; Ciaputa, Ewelina; Kosmos, Iva; Jovana, Mihajlović Trbovc; +1 Authors

D2.1b KSH2 Report: Initiating Change Beyond the Centre. A Literature Review of Gender Equality Plans in Research Organisations across Europe

Abstract

This report presents the results of the scoping literature review conducted by the Knowledge and Support Hub (KSH) "Widening Participation" of the INSPIRE project. The KSH "Widening Participation" aims to describe and understand the multiple organisational pathways in the development of gender equality that are rooted in local knowledge and circumstances. In order to provide the KSH with the relevant background for its work, this report maps the existing knowledge regarding gender equality policies, particularly in the form of Gender Equality Plans (GEPs), and their development in Research & Innovation (R&I) organisations in "Widening countries" as defined by the European Commission in the Horizon Europe programme. Being critical of the term "Widening countries," we explain its meaning in the introduction to this report and the reasons for using it as an operational term. We conducted a scoping literature review using two approaches: a database search of English-language literature (a top-down approach) and questionnaires to national experts (a bottom-up approach). This allowed us to map the available data on the development and implementation of GEPs at the organisational level in Research Performing Organizations (RPOs) and Research Funding Organizations (RFOs) in the selected countries. From the 3,618 documents identified in five databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, EBSCO, JSTOR), we selected 60 for review and included 88 of the 133 documents suggested by national experts in the literature review. While journal articles are the most numerous type of literature in both samples, reports are much more prevalent in the literature suggested by the national experts. Although the timeframe of the search was 2012-2023, the majority had been published in the last 5 years. The coverage of country cases in the literature is only balanced when the two approaches are combined.

Keywords

Research & Innovation, Research & Innovation, Horizon Europe, Gender Equality Plans, Widening Participation, Inclusive Gender Equality

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green