
handle: 10630/27433
Cross-tree constraints give feature models maximal expressive power since any interdependency between features can be captured through arbitrary propositional logic formulas. However, the existence of these constraints increases the complexity of reasoning about feature models, both for using SAT solvers or compiling the model to a binary decision diagram for efficient analyses. Although some works have tried to refactor constraints to eliminate them, they deal only with simple constraints (i.e., requires and excludes) or require the introduction of an additional set of features, increasing the complexity of the resulting feature model. This paper presents an approach that eliminates all the cross-tree constraints present in regular boolean feature models, including arbitrary constraints, in propositional logic formulas. Our approach for removing constraints consists of splitting the semantics of feature models into orthogonal disjoint feature subtrees, which are then analyzed in parallel to alleviate the exponential blow-up in memory of the resulting feature tree.
Work supported by the projects IRIS PID2021-122812OB-I00 (cofinanced by FEDER funds), LEIA UMA18-FEDERJA-157, and DAEMON H2020-101017109; and by Universidad de Málaga.
software product line, Constraint, Software product line, constraint, Ingeniería del software, parallelization, Parallelization, Feature tree, Automated analysis, feature tree, Programación en paralelo (Informática), Feature model, feature model
software product line, Constraint, Software product line, constraint, Ingeniería del software, parallelization, Parallelization, Feature tree, Automated analysis, feature tree, Programación en paralelo (Informática), Feature model, feature model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
