Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
DRYAD
Dataset . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Data from: Partitioning multiple facets of beta diversity in a tropical stream macroalgal metacommunity

Authors: Branco, Ciro; Bispo, Pitágoras; Peres, Cleto; Tonetto, Aurélio; Krupek, Rogério; Barfield, Michael; Holt, Robert;

Data from: Partitioning multiple facets of beta diversity in a tropical stream macroalgal metacommunity

Abstract

Aim: We evaluated different dimensions of beta diversity (taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional), and its components (spatial turnover and nestedness), of a stream macroalgal metacommunity, as well as the effect of local environmental variables, types of biome, and spatial factors on these dimensions and components. Location: Ten natural areas of southern Brazil, covering the main biomes represented in the region. Methods: We analyzed a data set collected in 105 stream segments using a dissimilarity partitioning approach to decompose total beta diversity (beta.SOR – multisite dissimilarity; beta.sor – pairwise dissimilarity) into spatial turnover (beta.SIM; beta.sim) and nestedness (beta.SNE; beta.sne) components. Furthermore, we assessed the effects of local environmental variables, types of biome, and spatial factors on beta diversity components by performing distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA), and its partial version (db-pRDA). Taxonomic data were tabulated considering four different species incidence matrices: total macroalgae; only green algae; only red algae; and only cyanobacteria. Results: For taxonomic and phylogenetic dimensions, very high values of total beta diversity (beta.SOR) were found for all species incidence matrices, with beta.SOR and spatial turnover (beta.SIM) showing strong correspondence to each other; nestedness (beta.SNE) had extremely low values. For the functional dimension, high beta.SOR value and a predominance of beta.SIM over beta.SNE were also found, but the difference between beta.SIM and beta.SNE was substantially lower than that observed for taxonomic and phylogenetic dimensions. In regard to taxonomic and phylogenetic dimensions, total beta diversity and spatial turnover were, in general, significantly related to local environmental variables, types of biome, and spatial factors for total macroalgae and green algae, whereas they were significantly related to types of biome and space for red algae, and only to local environment for cyanobacteria. Main conclusions: Our results showed, therefore, that spatial turnover was the main component of beta diversity regardless of the dimension and macroalgal species incidence matrix and that the relative influence of local environmental variables, types of biome, and spatial factors on the total beta diversity and its spatial turnover component can vary according to the dimension considered and by algal group.

Keywords

phylogenetic beta diversity, nestedness, functional beta diversity, stream macroalgae, taxonomic beta diversity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
  • 3
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
Related to Research communities