Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
DRYAD
Dataset . 2013
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Data from: Heterogeneous models place the root of the placental mammal phylogeny

Authors: Morgan, Claire C; Foster, Peter G.; Webb, Andrew E; Pisani, Davide; Mcinerney, James; O'Connell, Mary J; Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics;

Data from: Heterogeneous models place the root of the placental mammal phylogeny

Abstract

Heterogeneity among life traits in mammals has resulted in considerable phylogenetic conflict, particularly concerning the position of the placental root. Layered upon this are gene- and lineage-specific variation in amino acid substitution rates and compositional biases. Life trait variations that may impact upon mutational rates are longevity, metabolic rate, body size and germ line generation time. Over the past 12 years, three main conflicting hypotheses have emerged for the placement of the placental root. These hypotheses place: the Atlantogenata (common ancestor of Xenarthra plus Afrotheria), the Afrotheria, or the Xenarthra as the sister group to all other placental mammals. Model adequacy is critical for accurate tree reconstruction and by failing to account for these compositional and character exchange heterogeneities across the tree and dataset, previous studies have not provided a strongly supported hypothesis for the placental root. For the first time, models that accommodate both tree and dataset heterogeneity have been applied to mammal data. Here we show the impact of accurate model assignment and the importance of datasets in accommodating model parameters while maintaining the power to reject competing hypotheses. Through these sophisticated methods, we demonstrate the importance of model adequacy, dataset power and provide strong support for the Atlantogenata over other competing hypotheses for the position of the placental root.

Phylogenies obtained using variety of heterogeneous modelsMorganCC_Phylogenies.xls39TaxonSetAlignment data from 39 species in three formats: nucleotide (39TaxonSet_aa), amino acid (39TaxonSet_day) and dayhoff 6 recoded (39TaxonSet_day).

Country
United Kingdom
Keywords

Pongo abelii, Echinops telfairi, Pan troglodytes, Homo Sapiens, Myotis lucifugus, Sus scrofa, Microcebus murinus, Erinaceus europaeus, Gallus gallus, Loxodonta africana, Oryctolagus cuniculus, evolutionary models, Monodelphis domestica, Dipodomys ordii, Cavia porcellus, Callithrix jacchus, Spermophilus tridecemlineatus, Tupaia belangeri, Placental Root, Mus musculus, Dasypus novemcinctus, Felis catus, Pteropus vampyrus, Otolemur garnettii, Macropus eugenii, Procavia capensis, Choloepus hoffmanni, Sorex araneus, Ornithorhynchus anatinus, Ailuropoda melanoleuca, Gorilla gorilla, Tarsius syrichta, phylogenetic reconstruction, Ochotona princeps, Canis familiaris, Heterogeneous modelling, Rattus norvegicus, Macaca mulatta, mammal phylogeny, Bos taurus, Tursiops truncatus, Ursus maritimus, Vicugna pacos, Equus caballus

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 55
    download downloads 21
  • 55
    views
    21
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
1
Average
Average
Average
55
21