Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Global biome patterns of the Middle and Late Pleistocene

Authors: Huntley, Brian; Allen, Judy; Forrest, Matthew; Hickler, Thomas; Ohlemüller, Ralf; Singarayer, Joy; Valdes, Paul;

Global biome patterns of the Middle and Late Pleistocene

Abstract

Our primary aim was to assess the hypothesis that distinctive features of the patterns of vegetation change during successive Quaternary glacial–interglacial cycles reflect climatic differences arising from forcing differences. We addressed this hypothesis using 207 half-degree resolution global biome pattern simulations, for time slices between 800 ka and 2 ka, made using the LPJ-GUESS dynamic global vegetation model. Simulations were driven using ice-core atmospheric CO2 concentrations, Earth’s obliquity, and outputs from a pre-industrial and 206 palaeoclimate experiments; four additional simulations were driven using projected future CO2 concentrations. Climate experiments were run using HadCM3. Using a rule-based approach, above-ground biomass and leaf area index of LPJ-GUESS plant functional types were used to infer each grid cell’s biome. The hypothesis is supported by the palaeobiome simulations. To enable comparisons with the climatic forcing, multivariate analyses were performed of global vegetation pattern dissimilarities between simulations. Results showed generally similar responses to glacial–interglacial climatic variations during each cycle, although no two interglacials or glacials had identical biome patterns. Atmospheric CO2 concentration was the strongest driver of the dissimilarity patterns. Dissimilarities relative to the time slice with the lowest atmospheric CO2 concentration show the log–linear relationship to atmospheric CO2 concentration expected of an index of ecocarbon sensitivity. For each simulation, extent and total above-ground biomass of each biome were calculated globally and for three longitudinal segments corresponding to the major continental regions. Mean and minimum past extents of forest biomes, notably Temperate Summergreen Forest, in the three major continental regions strongly parallel relative tree diversities, hence supporting the hypothesis that past biome extents played an important role in determining present diversity. Albeit that they reflect the climatic consequences only of the faster Earth system components, simulated potential future biome patterns are unlike any during the past 800 ky, and likely will continue to change markedly for millennia if projected CO2 concentrations are realised.

See Allen et al. (2020), Huntley et al. (2021) and Huntley et al. (2023): Allen, J.R.M., Forrest, M., Hickler, T., Singarayer, J.S., Valdes, P.J. & Huntley, B. (2020). Global vegetation patterns of the past 140,000 years. Journal of Biogeography, 47, 2073-2090. doi 10.1111/jbi.13930 Huntley, B., Allen, J.R.M., Forrest, M., Hickler, T., Ohlemüller, R., Singarayer, J.S. & Valdes, P.J. (2021). Projected climatic changes lead to biome changes in areas of previously constant biome. Journal of Biogeography, 48, 2418-2428. doi 10.1111/jbi.14213 Huntley, B., Allen, J.R.M., Forrest, M., Hickler, T., Ohlemüller, R., Singarayer, J.S. & Valdes, P.J. (2023). Global biome patterns of the Middle and Late Pleistocene. Journal of Biogeography. doi 10.1111/jbi.14619

Adobe Acrobat or another .pdf viewer is needed to view 'slideshow'. Other files can all be opened using a simple text file editor (e.g. Wordpad).

Keywords

above-ground plant biomass, palaeovegetation maps, Multivariate analysis, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, ecocarbon sensitivity, FOS: Biological sciences, Leaf Area Index, glacial–interglacial cycle, atmospheric CO2 concentration, HadCM3, LPJ-GUESS

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 36
    download downloads 380
  • 36
    views
    380
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
36
380