Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5061/dryad.c9p26
The Batocrinidae are characteristic faunal elements in lower Mississippian shallow-marine settings in North America. Recent delineation of objectively defined genera allows a reexamination of batocrinid species and their distribution in the Fort Payne Formation (early Viséan, late Osagean), a well-studied array of carbonate and siliciclastic facies. The Fort Payne batocrinid fauna has fourteen species assigned to six genera, plus hybrid specimens. Magnuscrinus spinosus (Miller and Gurley, 1895a) is reassigned to its original placement in Eretmocrinus. Hybrid specimens (Ausich and Meyer, 1994) are regarded as Eretmocrinus magnificus X Eretmocrinus spinosus. Macrocrinus casualis is the dominant species of Macrocrinus in the Fort Payne, and M. mundulus and M. strotobasilaris are recognized in the Fort Payne Formation for the first time. Magnuscrinus cumberlandensis n. sp. is named, thirteen species are designated as junior synonyms, the name for the hybrid specimens is changed to Eretmocrinus magnificus × Eretmocrinus spinosus, and the previous occurrences of two species in the Fort Payne are rejected. The Eastern Interior Seaway was a mixed carbonate-siliciclastic setting with both shallow- and deep-water epicontinental sea facies ranging from relatively shallow autochthonous green shales to deep-water turbidite facies. Dizygocrinus was restricted to shallow-water carbonate and siliciclastic facies, Eutrochocrinus was restricted to shallow-water carbonate facies, and Magnuscrinus was restricted to deep-water facies. Species distributions varied from Abatocrinus steropes, Alloprosallocrinus conicus, Macrocrinus mundulus, and Uperocrinus nashvillae that occurred throughout the Eastern Interior Seaway to species that were restricted to a single facies. Eretmocrinus magnificus, Alloprosallocrinus conicus, and Uperocrinus robustus were the dominant batocrinids in the Fort Payne Formation.
AusichRhenbergMeyer-OnlineSupplement-Revised-10-06-17Methods, Synonomies, Localities, Measurements
Eretmocrinus magnificus, Abatocrinus steropes, Eretmocrinus spinosus, Alloprosallocrinus conicus, Abatocrinus grandis, Magnuscrinus cumberlandensis, Macrocrinus strotobasilaris, Uperocrinus robustus, Magnuscrinus kammeri, Macrocrinus mundulus, Magnuscrinus praegravis, Uperocrinus nashvillae, Macrocrinus casualis, Eretmocrinus magnificus × E. spinosus, Crinoidea, Magnuscrinus yandelli, Mississippian, Eretmocrinus ramulosus
Eretmocrinus magnificus, Abatocrinus steropes, Eretmocrinus spinosus, Alloprosallocrinus conicus, Abatocrinus grandis, Magnuscrinus cumberlandensis, Macrocrinus strotobasilaris, Uperocrinus robustus, Magnuscrinus kammeri, Macrocrinus mundulus, Magnuscrinus praegravis, Uperocrinus nashvillae, Macrocrinus casualis, Eretmocrinus magnificus × E. spinosus, Crinoidea, Magnuscrinus yandelli, Mississippian, Eretmocrinus ramulosus
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 9 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts