Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Federated Research D...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
DRYAD
Dataset . 2018
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Data from: Health Canada’s use of accelerated review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995-2016: a cohort study

Authors: Lexchin, Joel;

Data from: Health Canada’s use of accelerated review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995-2016: a cohort study

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines the use of accelerated approval pathways by Health Canada over the period 1995 to 2016 inclusive and the relationship between the use of these pathways and the therapeutic gain offered by new products. Design: Cohort study. Data sources: Therapeutic Products Directorate, Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate, Notice of Compliance database, Notice of Compliance with conditions web site, Patented Medicine Prices Review Board, La revue Prescrire, World Health Organization (WHO) Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. Interventions: None. Primary and secondary outcomes: Percent of new drugs evaluated by Health Canada that went through an accelerated pathway between 1995 and 2016 inclusive. Kappa values comparing the review status to assessments of therapeutic value for individual drugs. Results: 438 (70.3%) drugs went through the standard pathway, 185 (29.7%) an accelerated pathway. Therapeutic evaluations were available for 509 drugs. Health Canada used an accelerated approval pathway for 159 of the 509 drugs whereas only 55 were judged to be therapeutically innovative. The Kappa value for the entire period for all 509 drugs was 0.276 (95% CI 0.194, 0.359) or fair. Conclusion: Health Canada’s use of accelerated approvals was stable over the entire time period. Its ability to predict which drugs will offer a major therapeutic gain is relatively poor. The findings in this study should provoke a discussion about whether Health Canada should continue to use these pathways and if so how their use can be improved.

Supplementary Table 2All drugs approved between 1995-2016 that did not receive therapeutic assessmentsSupplementary Table 1All drugs approved between 1995-2016 that received therapeutic assessments from Patented Medicine Prices Review Board and/or La revue Prescrire

Country
Canada
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 6
  • 6
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
6
Related to Research communities