
doi: 10.3897/jbcr.e177463
Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly adopted in surgical education as a safe and controlled environment for developing technical and non-technical skills. Parallel to this, physiological biofeedback has emerged as a promising method for assessing stress, workload, and cognitive performance during complex tasks. This review explores the current evidence on VR and biofeedback in surgical training, highlighting their synergistic potential. We discuss how VR simulations replicate operative scenarios with high fidelity and how biofeedback parameters such as heart rate variability and galvanic skin response can provide objective insights into surgeon performance and stress regulation. We then outline a pilot study design in which novice and experienced surgeons are placed in a VR operating room scenario, with biofeedback metrics recorded. We hypothesise that experienced surgeons will demonstrate more stable physiological responses and superior task performance, reflecting greater resilience and expertise. Such findings could inform adaptive, personalised training models that adjust difficulty levels or provide targeted feedback in real time. Integrating VR and biofeedback into surgical education has the potential to enhance skill acquisition, improve stress management, and bridge the gap between simulation and the operating room.
biofeedback, cognitive load, surgical education, virtual reality, simulation, surgical training
biofeedback, cognitive load, surgical education, virtual reality, simulation, surgical training
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
