Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Annals of the Missou...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden
Article
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden
Article . 1975 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Studies in Bignoniaceae 17: Kigelianthe: A Synonym of Fernandoa (Bignoniaceae)

Authors: Gentry, Alwyn H. (Alwyn Howard);

Studies in Bignoniaceae 17: Kigelianthe: A Synonym of Fernandoa (Bignoniaceae)

Abstract

Kigelianthe of Madagascar is not separable from Fernandoa of continental Africa. The two genera seem to have been maintained separate as the result of a combination of historical accident and botanical provincialism. In fact the affinity of Kigelianthe with Fernandoa has never even been mentioned in the literature. A brief history of the situation may help in its clarification. Fernandoa (sphalm Ferdinandia) was described by Seemann in 1865 as a new genus of Tecomeae with the single species F. superba based on a collection of Welwitsch from Angola. In 1870 Seemann described a second species from East Africa as F. magnifica (sphalm Ferdinandoa) and in 1911 Gilg and Mildbraed described a third species from the Belgian Congo (Zaire) as Ferdinandia adolfifriderici. A fourth species, Ferdinandia mortehani De Wild, is probably not distinct from F. adolfi-friderici. The plethora of mispellings of Fernandoa (Ferdinandia, Ferdinandoa, Ferdinandia, Ferdlinanda, Ferdinandio, Ferdinandi), including that of the original description, is discussed by Milne-Redhead (1949) who also pointed out that the corrected spelling of the genus means the combination Fernandoa ferdinandi, based on Welwitsch's Bignonia ferdinandi, is not a tautonym and should be adopted for the type species. Sillans (1951, 1953) later described Tisserantodendron as a new genus of Central African Bignoniaceae with two species, one from Gabon and one from Oubangui-Chari (Central African Republic). Heine (1964) discovered that Sillans' genus was synonymous with Fernandoa and its two species synonymous with the two Equatorial African Fernandoa species. Meanwhile Baker (1881) had discovered a new species of Bignoniaceae from Madagascar in a collection of plants made by L. Kitching. He described it, in the absence of fruit, in the indehiscent-fruited tribe Crescentieae as Kigelia

Keywords

Source: Biodiversity Heritage Library, Source: BHL, Biodiversity, BHL-Corpus, Source: https://biodiversitylibrary.org

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Green
hybrid