Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.2307/1928921
The mutual hostility of ants belonging to colonies of different or even of the same species is so nearly universal, that it is surprising to find colonies belonging to different taxonomic subfamilies actually living in the same nest in a state of mutual toleration or even amity. Prof. Auguste Forel was the first to describe such an occurrence and to designate it as parabiosis, to distinguish it from those peculiar forms of social symbiosis, called "compound nests " and " mixed colonies," among certain Nearctic and Palearctic species. While on a trip to Colombia in i896 he made the following observations (i898): "I often observed, for the first time in the neighborhood of Santa Martha, two species of ants belonging to different genera and even to different subfamilies, a Dolichoderus and a Crenastogaster, both of a shining black color, the former much the larger and especially broader than the latter, and of a very different form, running very generally in common files, both over the ground and on the undergrowth. The files were very long and dense, so that the ants met and elbowed one another continually. " The two species were foraging on the bushes, the Cremastogaster seeking especially the plant-lice or scale insects, the Dolichoderus especially the juices of plants. Hence towards their terminations the files divided, each species proceeding to its own feeding ground. I finally succeeded in discovering on the trunk of a mango a large termite nest which had been appropriated by the two species of ants in question and was serving them as a habitation of a character hitherto unknown. The time for observation was unusually propitious, as each species had its sexual phases and its pupae in the nest. The latter was inhabited just as it had been abandoned by the termites, without any alterations or additions. In no part of it were the two species of ants actually mixed. Some of the corners were still occupied by the termites. " The chambers and galleries were nearly everywhere occupied either by the Cremastogaster with their females, males and pupae or by the Dolichoderus with their females, males and pupae. Each species, therefore, had its own separate menage, unlike the conditions seen in the mixed formicaries of our PolYergus and Formica, which carry on their households in common.
Pseudomyrmecinae, Arthropoda, Hexapoda, Hymenoptera, Pseudomyrmecini, taxonomy, Vespoidea, Crematogastrini, Animalia, Myrmicinae, insects, Formicidae, biodiversity
Pseudomyrmecinae, Arthropoda, Hexapoda, Hymenoptera, Pseudomyrmecini, taxonomy, Vespoidea, Crematogastrini, Animalia, Myrmicinae, insects, Formicidae, biodiversity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 21 | |
| downloads | 16 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts