Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Article . 2017
Data sources: ZENODO
Phytotaxa
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

DNA profiles to identify Dillenia species (Dilleniaceae) in Thailand

Authors: Thooptianrat, Tikumporn; Chaveerach, Arunrat; Sudmoon, Runglawan; Tanee, Tawatchai;

DNA profiles to identify Dillenia species (Dilleniaceae) in Thailand

Abstract

Surveying of the species throughout Thailand revealed 13 identified and one unidentified species including D. aurea, D. excelsa, D. grandifolia, D. hookeri, D. indica, D. obovata, D. ovata, D. parviflora, D. pentagyna, D. philippinensis, D. pulchella, D. reticulata, D. suffruticosa and Dillenia sp. They were phylogenetically examined based on RAPD profiles of 2,290 discrete characters including a monomorphic and 226 polymorphic characteristics. The phylogenetic relationships calculated from theses banding data show that the intraspecific genetic similarity (S) values ranged from 0.990 to 1.000, and the interspecific S values ranged from 0.520 to 0.790. The RAPD method can be effectively used in Dillenia study. However, its quality of unreproducible method, it cannot be reasonable used in any study on specific genes or areas. In additions, sequences from two molecular regions, rbcL gene and psbA-trnH spacer, were analyzed and determined for genetic distances. The rbcL gene sequences were rather ineffective, as all of the paired species displayed no or low genetic distance values. The psbA-trnH spacer sequences were rather effective, with only one pair (D. reticulata and D. parviflora) showing low genetic distance values. The other species pairs indicated rather far genetic distances, ranging from 0.006 (D. parviflora and D. grandifolia) to 0.376 (Dillenia specie and D. indica). Intraspecific genetic distance values ranged from 0–0.003 and 0–0.013 for rbcL and psbA-trnH spacer regions, respectively. Based on the results from both nucleotide variations and DNA fingerprinting, D. grandifolia and D. ovata were distinct Dillenia species.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!