
arXiv: 2403.13922
Abstract When children learn new words, they employ constraints such as the mutual exclusivity (ME) bias: A novel word is mapped to a novel object rather than a familiar one. This bias has been studied computationally, but only in models that use discrete word representations as input, ignoring the high variability of spoken words. We investigate the ME bias in the context of visually grounded speech models that learn from natural images and continuous speech audio. Concretely, we train a model on familiar words and test its ME bias by asking it to select between a novel and a familiar object when queried with a novel word. To simulate prior acoustic and visual knowledge, we experiment with several initialization strategies using pretrained speech and vision networks. Our findings reveal the ME bias across the different initialization approaches, with a stronger bias in models with more prior (in particular, visual) knowledge. Additional tests confirm the robustness of our results, even when different loss functions are considered. Based on detailed analyses to piece out the model’s representation space, we attribute the ME bias to how familiar and novel classes are distinctly separated in the resulting space.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Computation and Language, cs.CL, Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS), Computational linguistics. Natural language processing, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, P98-98.5, eess.AS, Computation and Language (cs.CL), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Audio and Speech Processing
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Computation and Language, cs.CL, Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS), Computational linguistics. Natural language processing, FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, P98-98.5, eess.AS, Computation and Language (cs.CL), Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Audio and Speech Processing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
