Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Journal of the A...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Article . 1977 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Perplexity—a measure of the difficulty of speech recognition tasks

Authors: F. Jelinek; R. L. Mercer; L. R. Bahl; J. K. Baker;

Perplexity—a measure of the difficulty of speech recognition tasks

Abstract

Using counterexamples, we show that vocabulary size and static and dynamic branching factors are all inadequate as measures of speech recognition complexity of finite state grammars. Information theoretic arguments show that perplexity (the logarithm of which is the familiar entropy) is a more appropriate measure of equivalent choice. It too has certain weaknesses which we discuss. We show that perplexity can also be applied to languages having no obvious statistical description, since an entropy-maximizing probability assignment can be found for any finite-state grammar. Table I shows perplexity values for some well-known speech recognition tasks. Perplexity Vocabulary Dynamic Phone Word size branching factor IBM-Lasers 2.14 21.11 1000 1000 IBM-Raleigh 1.69 7.74 250 7.32 CMU-AIX05 1.52 6.41 1011 35

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    265
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 0.1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 0.1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
265
Top 0.1%
Top 0.1%
Average
bronze