Systematic review of the evidence for an association between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and risk of obesity

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 04 Aug 2014 English Publisher:Oxford University Press (OUP)Journal:Nutrition Reviews, volume 72, pages 566-574 (issn: 0029-6643,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Trumbo, Paula R.; Rivers, Crystal R.;

doi: 10.1111/nure.12128

pmid: 25091794

Systematic review of the evidence for an association between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and risk of obesity

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

A systematic review of the evidence for an association between sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity was conducted. This review focused specifically on the role of sugar-sweetened beverages in obesity risk, taking into account energy balance. For the purpose of this review, scientific conclusions could not be drawn from the intervention studies that evaluated the relationship between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and obesity risk. Results of observational studies that examined the relationship between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and obesity risk that were adjusted for energy intake and physical activity were inconsistent for each of the three age groups evaluated (children, adolescents, and adults). From this review, evidence for an association between sugar-sweetened beverage intake and obesity risk is inconsistent when adjustment for energy balance is made.

Related Organizations

Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
United States
United States Food and Drug Administration
United States

Keywords

Adult, Risk, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Beverages, Cohort Studies, Sweetening Agents, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Humans, Obesity, Child, Energy Intake, Exercise, Aged

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	89
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%