Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ IEEE Accessarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
IEEE Access
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
IEEE Access
Article . 2022
Data sources: DOAJ
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
DBLP
Article . 2022
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Assessing Human Motion During Exercise Using Machine Learning: A Literature Review

Authors: Fotos Frangoudes; Maria Matsangidou; Eirini C. Schiza; Kleanthis C. Neokleous; Constantinos S. Pattichis;

Assessing Human Motion During Exercise Using Machine Learning: A Literature Review

Abstract

The World Health Organization promotes healthy living through regular physical activities, such as exercise and sports, as well as access to healthcare and rehabilitation services for people with motor dysfunctions. However, there is a lack of specialized personnel and increased costs associated with such activities. These have led to the increased use of machine learning for the analysis and evaluation of human motion during exercise. To study the latest advancements in this area, a systematic literature review focusing on publications from 2017 to 2021 was performed. As a result, 88 relevant publications were identified, which developed both shallow machine learning and deep learning algorithms. The results indicated that algorithms for human motion assessment should provide personalized and informative assessments, with explainable and interpretable outcomes, that can be computed in real-time or concurrently with the execution of an exercise. Furthermore, they should be easy to adapt based on the needs of applications and should be able to perform with different motion capture systems. This has been challenging because of the usually small amount of collected data, the lack of large open datasets, and the unique characteristics of exercise motions. Based on the above findings, guidelines for the development of such algorithms are proposed and discussed. They relate to the selection of the type of assessment, handling data imbalances, selecting of motion capture technologies, balancing between accuracy and speed, selecting the right algorithm, performing concurrent assessment during an exercise, personalization and scalability, and evaluation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

machine learning, exercise, human action evaluation, deep learning, healthcare, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, Assistive technologies, TK1-9971

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
    download downloads 59
  • 2
    views
    59
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
14
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
2
59
gold
Funded by
Related to Research communities