Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.5...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.5220/001230...
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.1...
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Conference object . 2024
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

3D Nuclei Segmentation by Combining GAN Based Image Synthesis and Existing 3D Manual Annotations

Authors: Xareni Galindo; Thierno Barry; Pauline Guyot; Charlotte Rivière; Rémi Galland; Florian Levet;

3D Nuclei Segmentation by Combining GAN Based Image Synthesis and Existing 3D Manual Annotations

Abstract

Abstract Nuclei segmentation is an important task in cell biology analysis that requires accurate and reliable methods, especially within complex low signal to noise ratio images with crowded cells populations. In this context, deep learning-based methods such as Stardist have emerged as the best performing solutions for segmenting nucleus. Unfortunately, the performances of such methods rely on the availability of vast libraries of ground truth hand-annotated data-sets, which become especially tedious to create for 3D cell cultures in which nuclei tend to overlap. In this work, we present a workflow to segment nuclei in 3D in such conditions when no specific ground truth exists. It combines the use of a robust 2D segmentation method, Stardist 2D, which have been trained on thousands of already available ground truth datasets, with the generation of pair of 3D masks and synthetic fluorescence volumes through a conditional GAN. It allows to train a Stardist 3D model with 3D ground truth masks and synthetic volumes that mimic our fluorescence ones. This strategy allows to segment 3D data that have no available ground truth, alleviating the need to perform manual annotations, and improving the results obtained by training Stardist with the original ground truth data.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!