
Abstract Nuclei segmentation is an important task in cell biology analysis that requires accurate and reliable methods, especially within complex low signal to noise ratio images with crowded cells populations. In this context, deep learning-based methods such as Stardist have emerged as the best performing solutions for segmenting nucleus. Unfortunately, the performances of such methods rely on the availability of vast libraries of ground truth hand-annotated data-sets, which become especially tedious to create for 3D cell cultures in which nuclei tend to overlap. In this work, we present a workflow to segment nuclei in 3D in such conditions when no specific ground truth exists. It combines the use of a robust 2D segmentation method, Stardist 2D, which have been trained on thousands of already available ground truth datasets, with the generation of pair of 3D masks and synthetic fluorescence volumes through a conditional GAN. It allows to train a Stardist 3D model with 3D ground truth masks and synthetic volumes that mimic our fluorescence ones. This strategy allows to segment 3D data that have no available ground truth, alleviating the need to perform manual annotations, and improving the results obtained by training Stardist with the original ground truth data.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
