Downloads provided by UsageCounts
pmid: 32340495
Feeding from own mother's milk is not always an option for preterm infants, and choosing between alternative means of feeding should be made in light of their effect on infants' health. In this work, we aimed to present evidence regarding feeding pre-term infants with human milk, either own mother's or donor milk (DM), and the potential effects on growth and other health related outcomes. Exclusive breastfeeding (BF) remains the optimal option, whereas feeding with DM as a sole diet or supplemental to maternal milk confers immunological advantages and fewer rates of necrotising enterocolitis against preterm formula feeding, yet the latter results in greater growth velocity. Literature gaps in the use of DM, practical suggestions for choosing suitable feeding means (i.e. continuous support of BF, adequate education regarding feeding preterm infants, including DM), and future perspectives on the potential effects of dietary manipulations of the maternal diet, are also discussed.
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Milk, Human, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Infant Formula, Diet, Treatment Outcome, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, Food, Fortified, Humans, Female, Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Infant, Premature, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Systematic Reviews as Topic
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Milk, Human, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Infant Formula, Diet, Treatment Outcome, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, Food, Fortified, Humans, Female, Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Infant, Premature, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Systematic Reviews as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 17 | |
| downloads | 8 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts