Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1038/076639c0
THE separation of the Quaternary period from the Recent period, which begins with the Neolithic, is attributable to the fact that an interruption was supposed to have occurred in Man's occupation of Europe. According to this view, the Recent period begins with his reappearance. Of late years it has been shown that such a view is untenable, and that no such interruption occurred. There is therefore much reason in Dr. Evans's contention that the Quaternary period, should be extended to include the Recent period. The term “Quaternary” has, however, a recognised meaning which could not be changed without, entering, into a discussion of the reasons for the step—a discussion which would be quite outside the province of the writer of a short review.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts