“Elevation and Subsidence”

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 18 Oct 1883 English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Nature, volume 28, pages 587-587 (issn: 0028-0836, eissn: 1476-4687,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Sington, T.;

doi: 10.1038/028587a0

“Elevation and Subsidence”

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

I HAVE only to-day found time to read Mr. Starkie Gardner's essay on “Elevation and Subsidence”; in the last paragraph Mr. Gardner states that the views he advances are not accepted by all geologists. As one who is entirely opposed to them, will you allow me to state as briefly as possible on what grounds I object to the theory he propounds, and how I account for the observed facts he mentions in support of it.

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average