Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1038/023124c0
THOUGH it is my principle never to answer any criticism of my writings, I find myself obliged to deviate for once from this rule by the character of your highly esteemed review, and by the desire to find a discerning appreciation from your readers, whose judgment has for me the greater value, as it is the main aim of all my works to restore the relations between the science of mind and natural philosophy. Therefore you would oblige me very much by publishing the following short remarks:—
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts