Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Abstract Evaluation and diagnosis of retina pathology is usually made via the analysis of different image modalities that allow to explore its structure. The most popular retina image method is retinography, a technique that displays the fundus of the eye, including the retina and other structures. Retinography is the most common imaging method to diagnose retina diseases such as Diabetic Retinopathy (DB) or Macular Edema (ME). However, retinography evaluation to score the image according to the disease grade presents difficulties due to differences in contrast, brightness and the presence of artifacts. Therefore, it is mainly done via manual analysis; a time consuming task that requires a trained clinician to examine and evaluate the images. In this paper, we present a computer aided diagnosis tool that takes advantage of the performance provided by deep learning architectures for image analysis. Our proposal is based on a deep residual convolutional neural network for extracting discriminatory features with no prior complex image transformations to enhance the image quality or to highlight specific structures. Moreover, we used the transfer learning paradigm to reuse layers from deep neural networks previously trained on the ImageNet dataset, under the hypothesis that first layers capture abstract features than can be reused for different problems. Experiments using different convolutional architectures have been carried out and their performance has been evaluated on the MESSIDOR database using cross-validation. Best results were found using a ResNet50-based architecture, showing an AUC of 0.93 for grades 0 + 1, AUC of 0.81 for grade 2 and AUC of 0.92 for grade 3 labelling, as well as AUCs higher than 0.97 when considering a binary classification problem (grades 0 vs 3).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 74 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 1 | |
| downloads | 32 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts