Views provided by UsageCounts
According to data from recent studies from Europe, a large percentage of patients have restricted access to innovative medicines for metastatic melanoma. Melanoma World Society and European Association of Dermato-oncology conducted a Web-based survey on access to first-line recommended treatments for metastatic melanoma by current guidelines (National Comprehensive Center Network, European Society for Medical Oncology [ESMO] and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/European Association of Dermato-oncology/European dermatology Forum) among melanoma experts from 27 European countries, USA, China, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico from September 1st, 2017 to July 1st, 2018. Data on licencing and reimbursement of medicines and the number of patient treated were correlated with the data on health expenditure per capita (HEPC), Mackenbach score of health policy performance, health technology assessment (HTA), ASCO and ESMO Magnitude of clinical benefit scale (ESMO MCBS) scores of clinical benefit and market price of medicines. Regression analysis for evaluation of correlation between the parameters was carried out using SPSS software. The estimated number of patients without access in surveyed countries was 13768. The recommended BRAFi + MEKi combination and anti-PD1 immunotherapy were fully reimbursed/covered in 19 of 34 (55.8%) and 17 of 34 (50%) countries, and combination anti-CTLA4+anti-PD1 in was fully covered in 6 of 34 (17.6%) countries. Median delay in reimbursement was 991 days, and it was in significant correlation with ESMO MCBS (p = 0.02), median market price (p = 0.001), HEPC and Mackenbach scores (p < 0.01). Price negotiations or managed entry agreements (MEAs) with national authorities were necessary for reimbursement. In conclusion, great discrepancy exists in metastatic melanoma treatment globally. Access to innovative medicines is in correlation with economic parameters as well as with healthcare system performance parameters. Patient-oriented drug development, market access and reimbursement pathways must be urgently found.
Compassionate Use Trials, Gross Domestic Product, Human Development, Innovative medicines, 610, Metastatic melanoma, Drug Costs, Russia, Targeted therapy, Reimbursement Mechanisms, access, Surveys and Questionnaires, AccessInnovative medicinesMetastatic melanomaTreatmentImmunooncologyTargeted therapy, METASTATIC MELANOMA, Humans, Treatment., Melanoma, Clinical Trials as Topic, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Health Priorities, Access ; Immunooncology ; Innovative medicines ; Metastatic melanoma ; Targeted therapy ; Treatment., Prescription Fees, Drugs, Investigational, targeted therapy, ResearchInstitutes_Networks_Beacons/mcrc; name=Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Access, Treatment, Europe, Value-Based Purchasing, Global Development Institute, Latin America, Socioeconomic Factors, ResearchInstitutes_Networks_Beacons/global_development_institute; name=Global Development Institute, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Immunooncology, Guideline Adherence
Compassionate Use Trials, Gross Domestic Product, Human Development, Innovative medicines, 610, Metastatic melanoma, Drug Costs, Russia, Targeted therapy, Reimbursement Mechanisms, access, Surveys and Questionnaires, AccessInnovative medicinesMetastatic melanomaTreatmentImmunooncologyTargeted therapy, METASTATIC MELANOMA, Humans, Treatment., Melanoma, Clinical Trials as Topic, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Health Priorities, Access ; Immunooncology ; Innovative medicines ; Metastatic melanoma ; Targeted therapy ; Treatment., Prescription Fees, Drugs, Investigational, targeted therapy, ResearchInstitutes_Networks_Beacons/mcrc; name=Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Access, Treatment, Europe, Value-Based Purchasing, Global Development Institute, Latin America, Socioeconomic Factors, ResearchInstitutes_Networks_Beacons/global_development_institute; name=Global Development Institute, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Immunooncology, Guideline Adherence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts