
ObjectiveTo validate a Cardiometabolic Disease Staging (CMDS) system for assigning risk level for diabetes, and all‐cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.Design and MethodsTwo large national cohorts, CARDIA and NHANES III, were used to validate CMDS. CMDS: Stage 0: metabolically healthy; Stage 1: one or two metabolic syndrome risk factors [other than impaired fasting glucose (IFG)]; Stage 2: IFG or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or metabolic syndrome (without IFG); Stage 3: two of three (IFG, IGT, and/or metabolic syndrome); and Stage 4: type 2 diabetes mellitus/CVD.ResultsIn the CARDIA study, compared with Stage 0 metabolically healthy subjects, adjusted risk for diabetes exponentially increased from Stage 1 [hazard ratio (HR) 2.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76‐4.55], to Stage 2 (HR 8.06, 95% CI 4.91‐13.2), to Stage 3 (HR 23.5, 95% CI 13.7‐40.1) (P for trend <0.001). In NHANES III, both cumulative incidence and multivariable adjusted HRs markedly increased for both all‐cause and CVD mortality with advancement of the risk stage from Stages 0 to 4. Adjustment for body mass index (BMI) minimally affected the risks for diabetes and all‐cause/CVD mortality using CMDS.ConclusionCMDS can discriminate a wide range of risk for diabetes, CVD mortality, and all‐cause mortality independent of BMI, and should be studied as a risk assessment tool to guide interventions that prevent and treat cardiometabolic disease.
Adult, Blood Glucose, Male, Adolescent, Article, Body Mass Index, Cohort Studies, Glucose Intolerance, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Obesity, Proportional Hazards Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Metabolic Syndrome, Incidence, Nutrition Surveys, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Cardiovascular Diseases, Disease Progression, Female
Adult, Blood Glucose, Male, Adolescent, Article, Body Mass Index, Cohort Studies, Glucose Intolerance, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Obesity, Proportional Hazards Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Metabolic Syndrome, Incidence, Nutrition Surveys, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Cardiovascular Diseases, Disease Progression, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 174 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
