Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2019
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

T‐D2D: A trust model for service offloading in device‐to‐device communication

Authors: Movahedi, Zeinab; Hosseini, Zahra;

T‐D2D: A trust model for service offloading in device‐to‐device communication

Abstract

AbstractWith the advances in pervasive computing, Internet of things (IoT) has gained considerable attention from both research and industrial communities. While IoT devices are able to provide computational services to other devices via device‐to‐device (D2D) communications, they are not guaranteed to be honest and collaborative. In such a context, the trust model can help to detect malicious service providers. However, malicious nodes may perform trust‐distortion attacks to mislead the trust model. They may perform on‐off attacks to remain undetected or bad‐mouth about others to make it difficult to infer if a contradictory recommendation comes from the on‐off nature of the evaluated node or dishonesty of the recommender. To address these issues, we propose T‐D2D, a lightweight trust model capable to face simultaneous trust‐distortion attacks. T‐D2D evaluates a node's nature using both short‐term and long‐term evaluation intervals to detect different types of on‐off attacks. Moreover, it keeps track of marginal misbehaving over several successive intervals to recognize the nature of suspicious on‐off nodes with light misbehaving attitude. To face bad‐mouthing attackers, T‐D2D limits its dependence on recommendations to when the direct trust is not decisive. Moreover, it evaluates the honesty of a recommender based on the correctness of its recommendations over time. Simulation results prove that T‐D2D exhibits significantly better performance than other counterparts in terms of trust level, correctness of calculated trust, percentage of selected malicious providers, total wasted execution time, and energy consumption in presence of simultaneous trust‐distortion attacks.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Energy utilization, Internet of things, Ubiquitous computing, Security of data, Industrial research, Internet of Things (IOT), Deviceto-device (D2D) communication, Service provider, Malicious nodes, Industrial communities, Device-to-Device communications, Long-term evaluation, Distortion attacks

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!