
En el currículum de química de l'ensenyament secundari hi ha teories sorgides històricament en contextos diferents, com les dels àcids i les bases, que s'aborden progressivament al llarg del currículum. En aquests casos, es pot produir una modelització híbrida, que combina aspectes d'un model i de l'altre, causada en part per la forma anhistòrica en què són presentats. En el present article, fem una anàlisi de les dificultats conceptuals més freqüents en la comprensió i l'ús dels models d'Arrhenius i de Brönsted-Lowry, i apuntem algunes orientacions didàctiques que poden ajudar a superar les dificultats esmentades.
In the chemistry curriculum of secondary education there are theories emerged historically in different contexts, such as acids and bases, which are progressively addressed throughout the curriculum. These cases could produce hybrid models, combining concepts from the different models which are presented, partly due to the ahistorical way in which are presented. This article analyses the conceptual difficulties more frequents in the Arrhenius and the Brönsted-Lowry models, and propose some teaching orientations that could help overcome the mentioned difficulties.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
