Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 20.500.12412/5642 , 11441/87230 , 11441/89672 , 10261/166741 , 2117/115056
In this paper, a performance comparison among three well-known stochastic model predictive control approaches, namely, multi-scenario, tree-based, and chance-constrained model predictive control is presented. To this end, three predictive controllers have been designed and implemented in a real renewable-hydrogen-based microgrid. The experimental set-up includes a PEM electrolyzer, lead-acid batteries, and a PEM fuel cell as main equipment. The real experimental results show significant differences from the plant components, mainly in terms of use of energy, for each implemented tech nique. Effectiveness, performance, advantages, and disadvantages of these techniques are extensively discussed and analyzed to give some valid criteria when selecting an appropriate stochastic predictive controller.
:Informàtica::Automàtica i control [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Microgrid, Supply, Hydrogen storage, Stochastic processes, Classificació INSPEC::Control theory::Predictive control, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Automàtica i control, Demand, :Control theory::Predictive control [Classificació INSPEC], Model predictive control, Supply and demand
:Informàtica::Automàtica i control [Àrees temàtiques de la UPC], Microgrid, Supply, Hydrogen storage, Stochastic processes, Classificació INSPEC::Control theory::Predictive control, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Automàtica i control, Demand, :Control theory::Predictive control [Classificació INSPEC], Model predictive control, Supply and demand
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 100 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 118 | |
| downloads | 134 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts