Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Standing Stock and Estimated Production Rates of Phytoplankton and Zooplankton in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island

Authors: Durbin, A. G.; Durbin, E. G.;

Standing Stock and Estimated Production Rates of Phytoplankton and Zooplankton in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island

Abstract

Seasonal changes in phytoplankton biomass and production, total zooplankton biomass, and biomass and potential production rates of the two dominant copepods, Acartia hudsonica (formerly called Acartia clausi) and Acartia tonsa are described for several stations in Narragansett Bay, R.I. Plankton in the bay behaved as a single population with simultaneous changes occurring at the upper bay (Station 5) and the lower bay (Station 1). Phytoplankton biomass was higher in the upper bay ( $$\bar x$$ =16.95 mg chl a·m−3) than in the lower bay ( $$\bar x$$ =6.37 mg chl a·m−3) and these 0269 0101 V differences in biomass were reflected in the phytoplankton production rates. The zooplankton, which was dominated by A. hudsonica in the spring and early summer and A. tonsa during summer and fall, showed no such consistent differences between the stations. Mean A. hudsonica biomass (St 1, $$\bar x$$ ;=82.7 mg dry wt·m−3; St 5, _ $$\bar x$$ ;=95.2 mg dry wt·m−3) exceeded that of A. tonsa (St 1, $$\bar x$$ ;=56.7 mg dry wt·m−3; St 5, $$\bar x$$ ;=60.0 mg dry wt·m−3). Potential production rates of the two Acartia 0269 0101 V spp. were strongly temperature dependent. Despite the higher biomass levels of A. hudsonica, low temperatures resulted in lower potential production rates ( $$\bar x$$ ; St 1=7.25 mg C·m−3 day−1; $$\bar x$$ ; St 5=10.77mg C·m−3 day−1) and biomass doubling times of up to 9.6 days. Potential production rates of A. tonsa at summer temperatures were high ( $$\bar x$$ ; St 1=19.0 mg C·m−3 day−1; $$\bar x$$ ; St 5=22.9 mg C·m−3 day−1) and biomass doubling times were generally less than one day.

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

510

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    105
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
105
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!