Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Psychometric Testing of the Clinical Nurse Leader Staff Satisfaction Instrument

Authors: LeeAnna, Spiva; Patricia L, Hart; Mary Lou, Wesley; Erin, Gallagher; Frank, McVay; Jessica, Waggoner; Nicole, Jarrell; +1 Authors

Psychometric Testing of the Clinical Nurse Leader Staff Satisfaction Instrument

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Patient care is changing rapidly with increased complexity of care, patient volumes, and financial constraints with rising health care costs and limited reimbursements. In response, the clinical nurse leader (CNL) role was developed. No appropriate instrument exists to measure staff satisfaction with the CNL role. This study describes the development and testing of an instrument designed to measure staff satisfaction with implementation of the CNL role. Methods: The psychometric properties and factor structure of the Clinical Nurse Leader Staff Satisfaction (CNLSS) instrument was examined. Results: A 2-factor solution was discovered for the CNLSS. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were acceptable for the subscales and instrument. Conclusion: The CNLSS is a valid and reliable instrument. Future research should focus on establishing test–retest reliability and construct validity.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Psychometrics, Attitude of Health Personnel, Reproducibility of Results, Personal Satisfaction, In Vitro Techniques, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Job Satisfaction, Young Adult, Job Description, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Nurse Clinicians, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!