
doi: 10.2307/2273936
The theory of objects recursive in functions of higher types was developed originally by Kleene [Kl 1,2]. The sets of objects of finite types are defined by Kleene as follows:T0 = ω = the set of nonnegative integers,and, for all i ∈ ω,Ti+1 = Tiω = the set of total functions from Ti to ω.In order to study and classify the functions recursive in Kolmogorov's R-operator, it is necessary to discuss recursion in partial functions of higher types. Accordingly, we define the partial objects of higher finite types byand, for all i ∈ ω, = the set of partial functions from Ti to ω.In addition to considering the partial functions from Ti to ω, the “hereditary partial” functions also have to be considered. For example, Hinman has studied objects of type 2 which act on partial functions from ω to ω. In case of dealing with a function F which has partial functions in its domain, we usually require that F be consistent, i.e. if F(f) is defined and g is an object of the same type as f, defined at least at all points where f is defined (in short, g extends f—notation: g ⊇ f), then F(g) is defined and is equal to F(f). Now we can define the higher type partial objects which are consistent byand, for all i ∈ ω, = the set of consistent partial functions from to ω.
1- section of R and 2E, Higher-type and set recursion theory, hierarchy of consistent partial functionals of pure type, Kolmogorov's R-operator, type 3 object, reindexing, Kleene's recursion theory for functionals, higher type recursion theory, \(\Sigma^ 0_ 3\)-game
1- section of R and 2E, Higher-type and set recursion theory, hierarchy of consistent partial functionals of pure type, Kolmogorov's R-operator, type 3 object, reindexing, Kleene's recursion theory for functionals, higher type recursion theory, \(\Sigma^ 0_ 3\)-game
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
