
The normal form for an n -dimensional map with irreducible nilpotent linear part is determined using s l 2 -representation theory. We sketch by example how the reducible case can also be treated in an algorithmic manner. The construction (and proof) of the s l 2 -triple from the nilpotent linear part is more complicated than one would hope for, but once the abstract s l 2 theory is in place, both the description of the normal form and the computational splitting to compute the generator of the coordinate transformation can be handled explicitly in terms of the nilpotent linear part without the explicit knowledge of the triple. If one wishes one can compute the normal form such that it is guaranteed to lie in the kernel of an operator and one can be sure that this is really a normal form with respect to the nilpotent linear part; one can state that the normal form is in s l 2 -style. Although at first sight the normal form theory for maps is more complicated than for vector fields in the nilpotent case, it turns out that the final result is much better. Where in the vector field case one runs into invariant theoretical problems when the dimension gets larger if one wants to describe the general form of the normal form, for maps we obtain results without any restrictions on the dimension. In the literature only the two-dimensional nilpotent case has been described so far, as far as we know.
normal form, sl2 representation, FOS: Mathematics, nilpotent maps, Representation Theory (math.RT), dynamical system, Mathematics - Representation Theory
normal form, sl2 representation, FOS: Mathematics, nilpotent maps, Representation Theory (math.RT), dynamical system, Mathematics - Representation Theory
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
