
AbstractBackgroundThe prognostic importance of intraparotid lymph node metastasis (P+) in patients with primary parotid gland carcinoma is unclear.MethodsNineteen retrospective and noncomparative cohort studies, published between 1992 and 2020, met the inclusion criteria and included 2202 patients for this systematic review.ResultsThe pooled prevalence of the P in adult patients in the unselected studies was 24.10% (95% confidence interval = 17.95‐30.25). The number of P+ lymph nodes per patient was counted in only three studies and ranged from 1 to 11. The 5‐year recurrence‐free survival rate based on Kaplan‐Meier analysis varied from 83% to 88% in P− patients compared to 36% to 54% in P+ patients. The average hazard ratio for tumor recurrence in patients with P+ compared to P− was 2.67 ± 0.58.ConclusionsP+ is an independent negative prognostic factor in primary parotid gland cancer and should be included into the treatment planning.
Adult, clinical significance, intraparotid lymph node metastasis, prevalence, 1105 Dentistry, Review, survival, 3203 Dentistry, MANAGEMENT, Journal Article, Humans, NECK, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies, Science & Technology, 3202 Clinical sciences, primary parotid cancer, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Prognosis, Parotid Neoplasms, GLAND, nodal metastasis, Otorhinolaryngology, Lymphatic Metastasis, Surgery, SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA, Lymph Nodes, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, MUCOEPIDERMOID CARCINOMA
Adult, clinical significance, intraparotid lymph node metastasis, prevalence, 1105 Dentistry, Review, survival, 3203 Dentistry, MANAGEMENT, Journal Article, Humans, NECK, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies, Science & Technology, 3202 Clinical sciences, primary parotid cancer, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Prognosis, Parotid Neoplasms, GLAND, nodal metastasis, Otorhinolaryngology, Lymphatic Metastasis, Surgery, SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA, Lymph Nodes, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, MUCOEPIDERMOID CARCINOMA
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
