
pmid: 15291933
Abstract.Background: To compare two methods of measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) and to evaluate whether repeated measurements taken with the Ocuton S applanation self‐tonometer can improve reliability. Methods: Ocuton S and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and corneal thickness measurements taken with the Orbscan topography system, were successfully performed in 64 of 68 glaucoma patients. Results: The median IOPs were 15.5 mmHg using GAT, and 16 mmHg using the first self‐taken Ocuton S measurement (n = 64). The differences between the median of the GAT measurements and the first Ocuton S measurement, and the medians of the three and six separate Ocuton S measurements were within 3 mmHg in 52%, 59% and 67% of cases, respectively. The mean corneal thickness of all evaluated eyes was 545.3 µm. There was no effect of corneal thickness on the accuracy of either of the two devices (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Repeated measurements can improve the reliability of the Ocuton S. However, even with repeated measurements only every second patient succeeds in obtaining reliable measurements.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Corneal Topography, Reproducibility of Results, Glaucoma, Middle Aged, Cornea, Self Care, Tonometry, Ocular, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Intraocular Pressure, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Corneal Topography, Reproducibility of Results, Glaucoma, Middle Aged, Cornea, Self Care, Tonometry, Ocular, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Intraocular Pressure, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
