Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Animal Feed Science ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Article . 1992 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Forage quality of alfalfa protected by resistance to bacterial leaf spot

Authors: A.W. Lenssen; E.L. Sorensen; G.L. Posler; D.L. Stuteville;

Forage quality of alfalfa protected by resistance to bacterial leaf spot

Abstract

Abstract Bacterial leaf spot (BLS), caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. alfalfae Dye (Xca), can prevent stand establishment and decrease the yield and persistence of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in the central USA. Previous studies have shown that BLS inoculation may affect concentrations of monophenolic compounds and thus alter the forage quality of alfalfa. In a controlled environment, comparisons were made of forage quality, including phenolic monomers, of alfalfa cv. Kanza (susceptible) and KS76 germplasm (derived from Kanza, resistant) with and without inoculation with Xca. The cultivar × inoculation interactions were non-significant (P > 0.05) for all parameters determined for leaves and stems. Leaves from Xca-inoculated plants had more neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, permanganate lignin and cellulose, and less true in vitro digestible dry matter, than did leaves from uninoculated plants. The nutritive value of stems was not altered by inoculation. Regardless of inoculation treatment, leaves had a five times greater consentration of total phenolics than did stems, yet neutral detergent fiber from stems was less digested than that from leaves. Across inoculations, leaves of BLS-resistant KS76 had superior forage quality, including lower concentrations of ferulic acid and p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, than leaves of BLS-susceptible Kanza. The Xca-inoculated stems had lower p-coumaric and ferulic acids and total phenolics than uninoculated controls. Stems of Kanza had higher concentrations of ferulic acid and total phenolics than stems of KS76. Resistance to BLS in KS76 protected nutritive value of leaves.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!