
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The external morphology of aquatic, semiaquatic and terrestrial lucioline larvae was investigated in order to provide anoverview of what traits constitute the extremely ecologically diverse Luciolinae (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). The aquaticspecies, Aquatica ficta (Olivier), A. leii (Fu et Ballantyne), A. hydrophila (Jeng et al.), A. lateralis (Motschulsky), A. wu-hana Fu et Ballantyne, Luciola cruciata Motschulsky and L. owadai Satô et Kimura cannot swim, but instead crawl onthe substrate. They have soft bodies, lateral abdominal tracheal gills and glands on eversible structures that secrete repel-lent substances. The back-swimming species, Luciola substriata Gorham and L. aquatilis Thancharoen, which inhabit thesurface of ponds, have hardened exoskeletons, and lack gills and eversible glands. Unlike the crawling species, the back-swimmers have sense organs along the ventral surface of the apical maxillary and labial palpomeres, and are metapneusticin their later instars. The larval morphology of the aquatic species is contrasted with Pygoluciola qingyu Fu et Ballantyne, whose larvae are semiaquatic and lack gills, and with the terrestrial larvae of Asymmetricata circumdata (Motsch.) (newly
Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Lampyridae, Taxonomy
Coleoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Biodiversity, Lampyridae, Taxonomy
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 20 |