Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The Review Assessment Rubric is meant for anyone who is evaluating a research manuscript’s review. This may include a teacher in the context of peer review training, a peer helping the review author evaluate their review, or even the review author themselves to self-evaluate their own review. The rubric comprises 10 statements for which the evaluator is asked to provide a score and a written comment to help improve the review. This Review Assessment Rubric is part of a toolkit developed in the context of PREreview Open Reviewers. The other two guides published in the toolkit are the Bias Reflection Guide and the Reviewer Guide.
{"references": ["Foster, A., Hindle, S., Murphy, K. M., Saderi, D. (2021). Open Reviewers Bias Reflection Guide. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5484052", "Foster, A., Hindle, S., Murphy, K. M., Saderi, D. (2021). Open Reviewers Reviewer Guide. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5484087"]}
Rubric, Preprint, Peer review
Rubric, Preprint, Peer review
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 492 | |
| downloads | 181 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts