
AbstractSeveral studies have documented that length gain often lags behind weight gain during infancy and early childhood, suggesting that linear growth is partly regulated by initial body mass or fatness. To investigate this hypothesis, we analysed data from four longitudinal studies on growth of infants in the first 12 months: (1) U.S. breast‐fed and formula‐fed infants (n = 89); (2) breast‐fed infants in Ghana (n = 190); (3) normal birthweight, breast‐fed infants in Honduras (n = 108); and (4) term, low‐birthweight breast‐fed infants in Honduras (n = 119). The dependent variable was length gain during each 3‐month interval (1– 4, 2–5, 3–6, 4–7, 5–8, 6–9, 7–10, 8–11 and 9–12 months). Three main independent variables were examined: initial weight‐for‐length z‐score (W/L), weight change during the prior 3 months, and initial skinfold thickness. Controlling for maternal height, infant sex, and initial length‐for‐age z‐score, length gain was positively correlated with initial W/L and prior weight change during all age intervals and with initial skinfold thickness at 3 and 4 months (r = 0.15–0.36; P < 0.01). There was no evidence of a threshold effect. These associations were evident in all four populations, in both boys and girls, and in breast‐fed and formula‐fed infants. The consistency of this relationship across studies supports the hypothesis that linear growth is partly regulated by initial body mass or fatness in infants.
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, Aging, Milk, Human, Body Weight, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Ghana, Body Height, Infant Formula, United States, Skinfold Thickness, Child Development, Adipose Tissue, Honduras, Birth Weight, Humans, Female, Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, Aging, Milk, Human, Body Weight, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Ghana, Body Height, Infant Formula, United States, Skinfold Thickness, Child Development, Adipose Tissue, Honduras, Birth Weight, Humans, Female, Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
