Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Engei Gakkai zasshiarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Engei Gakkai zasshi
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Some Factors Affecting the Rooting of Softwood Cuttings of Japanese Persimmon

Authors: Takuya Tetsumura; Ryutaro Tao; Akira Sugiura;

Some Factors Affecting the Rooting of Softwood Cuttings of Japanese Persimmon

Abstract

The factors influencing rooting of softwood cuttings of two cultivars, 'Jiro' and 'Nishimurawase', of Japanese persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb.) were studied. The cuttings from the root suckers of micropropagated trees rooted best, followed by those from the shoots of micropropagated trees and grafted trees in that order. Except for the cuttings from grafted trees, the shorter the cuttings, the higher the rooting percentage. When planted in late June, the single bud, leafy cuttings (leaf-bud cuttings) taken from the root suckers and treated with indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 70% or more rooted well. When planted in late July or late August, however, less than 40% of the leaf-bud cuttings rooted. Comparable cuttings without IBA treatment scarcely rooted when planted in late June, and did not root at all when planted in late July or late August. There was no significant difference in the rooting capacity between the two cultivars. Almost all leaf-bud cuttings from the root suckers survived during the experimental period (60 days), although those from the shoots of grafted trees died gradually ; none of the 25-cm cuttings from the root suckers survived 25 days after planting. The vascular cambium at the base of leaf-bud cuttings from the root suckers began to divide actively soon after planting. Callus formed in the phloem and cortex of the cut surface and developed extensively. However, active cell division was not observed at the bases of leaf-bud cuttings from the shoots of grafted trees nor 25-cm cuttings from the root suckers. Initial cells of the adventitious root produced in the vascular cambium of the leaf-bud cuttings from the root suckers were first observed 20 days after planting ; they developed to roots and emerged 30 days after planting.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
gold