
doi: 10.1063/1.469643
To study the reliability of the recently developed explicitly correlated coupled cluster method (CCSDT1-R12) we have performed calculations on the four-electron systems Be, Li−, and LiH on various levels of perturbation theory and coupled cluster theory with and without explicit linear rij terms. The convergence of the total energy with increasing size of the basis is much faster than for the conventional coupled cluster approach. Our CCSDT1-R12 energies of −14.667261 Eh for Be and −7.500671 Eh for the Li− ground state are the best ones computed so far and are close to previous estimates of the CCSDT 1 basis set limits. The Be result differs from the ‘‘experimental’’ nonrelativistic energy by ca. 0.1 mEh, mainly due to neglect of quadruple excitations. Our Born–Oppenheimer energy of LiH at the equilibrium distance of −8.070487 Eh is close to the experimental nonrelativistic energy. The binding energy (D0) of LiH with respect to Li+ and H− is calculated as −7.152 eV, in agreement with the experimental value within a meV. For LiH the harmonic vibrational frequencies and other related spectroscopic constants are studied in their basis dependence as well. The equilibrium distance and the harmonic vibrational frequency of LiH are much less sensitive to the inclusion of terms that explicitly depend on the interelectronic coordinates. Basis set superposition errors are much smaller in the R12 approach than in the conventional calculations, especially for the smaller basis sets.
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/540, ddc:540, Chemistry & allied sciences, 540
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/540, ddc:540, Chemistry & allied sciences, 540
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 65 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
