
arXiv: 1905.09948
The information-based optimal subdata selection (IBOSS) is a computationally efficient method to select informative data points from large data sets through processing full data by columns. However, when the volume of a data set is too large to be processed in the available memory of a machine, it is infeasible to implement the IBOSS procedure. This paper develops a divide-and-conquer IBOSS approach to solving this problem, in which the full data set is divided into smaller partitions to be loaded into the memory and then subsets of data are selected from each partitions using the IBOSS algorithm. We derive both finite sample properties and asymptotic properties of the resulting estimator. Asymptotic results show that if the full data set is partitioned randomly and the number of partitions is not very large, then the resultant estimator has the same estimation efficiency as the original IBOSS estimator. We also carry out numerical experiments to evaluate the empirical performance of the proposed method.
21 pages, 3 figures, 1 table
D-optimality, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Linear regression; mixed models, Computational problems in statistics, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, information-based optimal subdata selection (IBOSS), Statistics Theory (math.ST), Statistical aspects of information-theoretic topics, Statistics - Computation, Methodology (stat.ME), information matrix, big data, linear regression, FOS: Mathematics, subdata, Statistics - Methodology, Computation (stat.CO)
D-optimality, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Linear regression; mixed models, Computational problems in statistics, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, information-based optimal subdata selection (IBOSS), Statistics Theory (math.ST), Statistical aspects of information-theoretic topics, Statistics - Computation, Methodology (stat.ME), information matrix, big data, linear regression, FOS: Mathematics, subdata, Statistics - Methodology, Computation (stat.CO)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
