
handle: 11562/1053233
Abstract This study empirically investigates the relationships between lean management practices, dynamic capabilities, and sustainable business performance (including economic, environmental, and social performance). Based on the dynamic capabilities approach, known also as a theory of sustainable competitive advantage, we explain why many adopters of lean management fail to sustain positive outcomes over time. More concretely, first, this study conceptually identifies systematic problem-solving, agile manufacturing (or change proficiency), and continuous improvement as higher-order or “lean-related dynamic capabilities” that seem to be effective for sustainable benefits. Then, a survey questionnaire on a sample of 99 Italian manufacturing firms is carried out and results of partial least square structural equation modelling indeed reveal that “lean-related dynamic capabilities” can serve as mechanisms through which lean management contributes to sustainable business performance. The main findings help to distinguish between “lean adopters” achieving sustainable outcomes and “lean duplicators” obtaining only short-term outcomes and quick wins. For firms to become “lean adopters”, they are required not only to consider lean as a full package but also to constantly establish and develop higher-order or “lean-related dynamic capabilities”. This study is an innovative empirically-informed attempt to conceptualize “lean-related dynamic capabilities” and embed them into a framework through which lean management practices result in sustainable outcomes.
Sustainable business performance, Dynamic capabilities, Lean management
Sustainable business performance, Dynamic capabilities, Lean management
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
